<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPS &#8216;Postal Notification&#8217; themed emails lead to malware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webroot.com/2012/11/06/usps-postal-notification-themed-emails-lead-to-malware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webroot.com/2012/11/06/usps-postal-notification-themed-emails-lead-to-malware/</link>
	<description>WEBROOT - INSIGHTS INTO THREATS AND TRENDS FROM OUR INTERNET SECURITY EXPERTS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:00:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddanchev</title>
		<link>http://blog.webroot.com/2012/11/06/usps-postal-notification-themed-emails-lead-to-malware/#comment-83792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ddanchev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webroot.com/?p=8521#comment-83792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

It means that in the exact time that the sample was scanned, 21 scanners didn&#039;t detect it using the standard signatures based detection mechanism.

This is prone to improve over time, as VirusTotal shares samples with antivirus vendors. It doesn&#039;t mean that the behavioral detection -- where applicable -- would also miss detecting this. This is a metric that VirusTotal does not offer for the time being.

Webroot is intercepting the malicious activity about to be performed by the executable, and is consequently preventing it from taking place.

Thanks,
Dancho]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>It means that in the exact time that the sample was scanned, 21 scanners didn&#8217;t detect it using the standard signatures based detection mechanism.</p>
<p>This is prone to improve over time, as VirusTotal shares samples with antivirus vendors. It doesn&#8217;t mean that the behavioral detection &#8212; where applicable &#8212; would also miss detecting this. This is a metric that VirusTotal does not offer for the time being.</p>
<p>Webroot is intercepting the malicious activity about to be performed by the executable, and is consequently preventing it from taking place.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dancho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JL</title>
		<link>http://blog.webroot.com/2012/11/06/usps-postal-notification-themed-emails-lead-to-malware/#comment-82449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webroot.com/?p=8521#comment-82449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend, when you identify the MD5&#039;s &quot;detected by 23 out of 44 antivirus scanners as...&quot; does that mean that 21 antivirus scanners missed the threat, or just that those scanners named the MD5 to a common signature?  

How is Webroot fairing on its behavioral analysis if users click these malicious email links?  A+?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend, when you identify the MD5&#8242;s &#8220;detected by 23 out of 44 antivirus scanners as&#8230;&#8221; does that mean that 21 antivirus scanners missed the threat, or just that those scanners named the MD5 to a common signature?  </p>
<p>How is Webroot fairing on its behavioral analysis if users click these malicious email links?  A+?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
